SF Hungary Moderator
“Friend of Stormfront”
Sustaining Member
Truly, a great thread John.
One of the best on Stormfront.
I used to count the White Men and Women who were drawn into the Hollywood swamp and after decades turned around and bit the hand that was feeding them.
Some of them were able to draw blood but Mel tore off the whole arm.
__________________
On another forum, a comrade gave me great new info re the Finnish-Jewish press baron-billionaire Erkko, who hounds white nationists through his various rags and TV stations across Finland — and promotes race-mixing, not for Jews, of course, but for the Nordic Finns!
I had posted this on Finland and the Finnish Jew Erkko (originally on LibertyForum.org).
Then a friend challenged me: “PROVE Erkko is a Jew.”
I wrote back:
1) A trusted friend says he is Jewish 2) he is an international press baron 3) he promotes race-mixing for Finns but glorifies Israel as a pure Jewish state, and he demands ruthless enforcement of hate-speech laws against whites, 4) he looks Jewish, NOT Finnish! 5) that wisenheimer expression that elite Jews have — and that even F. Scott Fitzgerald noted on one of his novels — and that needs to be urgently slapped off, that “We are the royal race!” arrogance.
(As Charles de Gaulle once said about the Jews at a controversial press conference in the mid-1960s:
Quote:
| “Les Juifs sont un peuple d’elite, surs d’eux et dominateur.” (“The Jews are an elite people, sure of themselves and domineering.”) |
Look at that nose. The nose is too big and not Finnish at all. You know very well what a Finnish nose looks like — either Nordic-Scandinavian-straight or that up-turned quasi-Asiatic look that some few Finns have.
Finland is a large, flat country not unlike Minnesota, in the USA, where many Finns settled so they could continue to enjoy bone-chilling winters and mosquito-infested summers. But a stolid Finn never complains. Racially, the five million Finns seem to be about 85% Swedish genetically (the conquered people who originally lived there), although they speak an Asiatic language from the Finnish-Asiatic conquerors 2000 years ago. An incredibly hard-working and honest people, Protestant Lutherans by tradition, they are most proud of their legendary bravery, which they call in Finnish sisu. When Joe Stalin attacked them with an avalanche of tanks in 1940 he found out all about Finnish sisu.
Erkko has a large, curved Jew honker!
Also, the lower lip has an everted “shelf.” The flesh sticks out under the lower lip. That is part of the classic semitic look — Arabic or Jewish. (Ear position on the face can be another give-away.)
(Well, maybe this leftwing billionaire press baron who also owns Belgian and Russian newspapers is just an indigent Palestinian refugee from Gaza!)
A friend of yours wrote you his opinion — and his knowledge.
* * *
Perhaps not ethnically Jewish, but emotionally and ideologically he could be. He owns the biggest media house in Finland, which was founded by his grand father. The Erkko family has a long history in liberal politics in Finland. Helsingin Sanomat, which is the biggest newspaper in Finland and the crown jewel of the Sanoma WSOY media empire, is known for its urban left/liberal and multiculturalist agenda. Aatos Erkko was also the driving force in 1994 when Finland joined the EU.
As far as I know Mr. Erkko received part of his education in USA and even worked there for a while in a law firm. He seems to be a good friend of Rupert Murdoch and is a member of the board of Murdoch’s media company – and has attended the meetings of the Bilderberg society. Aatos Erkko is your typical atlantist/globalist Volksverräter [German for "folk-betrayer"]- every Finnish nationalist hates Helsingin Sanomat … but still subscribes it. My family quit subscribing to Helsingin Sanomat already in the 70′s because the staff of Helsingin Sanomat was taken over by young communist radicals and Soviet kiss-asses.
================= Then I continued:
After 30 years in this Cause, I go by experience, facts — and my instinct.
JEW.
If he were NOT a press baron and a leftwing white-hater, still, yes, a Jewish nose would be a tipoff to anyone to at least dig further.
Just as African hair, lips and dark skin would be a tipoff to being an African.
Or do you think a Swede or Finn can will himself to have a Jewish nose???
A classic Finnish up-turned nose. It don’t bother me! 
How do semitic genes pop up suddenly in Finland if not from a semite?
I see Italian faces in Scotland. You know why? Just one reason: because Italians of Italian blood moved there.
JdN
===========
And now this important new contribution, which I share today with LibertyForum readers (and the lurking Jews who also boost “views” of this thread).
* * *
The media in Finland
All non-state owned TV channels and almost all important medias are owned by two groups – Sanoma WSOY and Alma Media.
58,4 percent of Sanoma WSOY is owned by Aatos Erkko, the richest person in Finland. The mother of Aatos Erkko was Violet Sutcliffe, a well-kept secret, a Jewess from England who came into Finland during the Bolshevik revolution of Russia. Of the rest of Sanoma WSOY, at least 14 percent is owned by Erkko’s sister and his sister’s children. Erkko’s sister’s other child owns 5,3 percent. I am unable to tell whether rest of the owners are Erkko’s or his relatives. All in all Erkko family controls at least the 77,7% of the Sanoma WSOY and quite probably close to 80-85% percent through the different Erkko owned businesses. A picture of the mostly non-Finnish looking Jew Aatos Erkko and his English wife: http://www.yle.fi/linnanjuhlat/1997/kuvat/kuva24_i.jpg
Alma Media is 33% owned directly by Bonnier Service, that is a Jewish family business from Sweden, that changed its name from Hirschel to Bonnier. 23.4% is owned by TV4, that is in turn owned 23,4% by the Bonnier family. 33% is owned by Talentum Oy, a media corporation, of which Bonnier family owns 33% in turn. All in all in the least the majority of Alma Media is owned by the Bonnier family, which has tightened its grip on Alma Media each year. About 20 percent, in small parts , are owned by Finnish insurance companies.
Alma and Sanoma WSOY together own 51% of STT, Finland’s news agency, which supplies news to Finnish media including the state owned YLE along with the multinational news agencies such as the Reuters.
(Some of the data was from: http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/jorma.uski/omistus.html , collected in 2002)
Finnish Television
Nelonen, MTV3 and SUB-TV, the three commercial and by far the most watched channels (in this order) in Finland, which are owned by Sanoma WSOY (Nelonen) and Alma Media respectively. They supply the nation with most of the consumer crap: the only Finnish TV channels with adverts, TV-shops, Mobile phone on screen chats, -games and -mobile dating services. The American soap series (for example. the Bold and the Beautiful), American drama series (like Six Feet Under or the Party of Five), some politically correct scifi like the Stargate and then Hollywood movies. Then there are the different “reality” TV shows like for example American cop shows and survivors (even a Finnish versions of it). MTV3 also runs the Finland’s own soap series, “Secret Lives”, which uses for all I know an international format, including gay main character, drugs, lots of commercialism, politically correct social life and of course endless sex and dating drama.
It is apparently played by utterly and completely non-gifted actors, deduced from a sample size of some seven episodes. A male actor of this series apparently also got his own series, where he poses as a famous Finnish porn star [!], who fictionally appears daily in the headlines of the real evening newspapers in Finland.
MTV3 also airs TV series such as Don’t tell momma, a drama series about the “everyday life” of gays, and Sex and the City, an obviously Jewish series about not having babies and living under a commercial Jewish-controlled democracy. Sanoma WSOY’s Nelonen is the same, if not worse, with material like Do you want to be a millionaire?, dozens of American shows I don’t want to even know about considering their names like Felicity, 4Pop or Judging Amy. Sub-TV airs mostly American tv-shows, their Finnish imitations and mobile phone games: http://www.subtv.fi/ohjelmat.shtml .
I could grind on endlessly about the specific examples, but the fact is that these channels are thoroughly pro-Jewish, pro-multicultural society, pro-commercialism etc. It’s kind of sad that I have to mention the United States of America as the origin of the trash culture entertainment, but the fact is that Jewish interests created American pop-culture not only for Americans, but also to be able to export it to the other nations, and this they surely have done.
Finland has also the Yleisradio TV, which provides channels non-commercial channels YLE 1 and YLE 2, and lately also a special documentary and news channels for the digital TV. It is a state owned and controlled media, which has a mission, as stated in law, to provide quality content for the nation. It provides education, news and entertainment. YLE is directly controlled by the parliament and thus reflects the values of the elected officials, which currently politically means (Jewish controlled) Social Democracy.
YLE has A fewer amount of viewers than the commercial channels. It does, or at least did, provide some quality children’s cartoons, documentaries about the nature, Finnish TV-series etc. Then it provides the news, lotto and other gambling, the essentials for a totalitarian social democracy. YLE 2 has also picked mobile phone games for the mornings and late nights. YLE also runs an animated comedy series about the cabinet members and prominent politicians, which I think is an international concept. Naturally the series is excellent as propaganda in favour of social democracy, but most lemmings actually see it as exactly the opposite, which of course makes it even better propaganda. YLE channels also air some of the somewhat better American entertainment like the Frasier and Babylon 5, at least the latter of which reflects Jewish values by the self-proclaimed atheist Jew J. M. Strazynski.
Quote:
| In JMS’s latest series, the Jeremiah, a Negro and a White guy go about the wrecked U.S., fighting white and black supremacists, hate and bigotry. For example the leading character actually gases skinheads almost to death in one episode, but is stopped by his Negro partner. |
Jeremiah is obviously intended as propaganda against nationalistic movements and in support of the Jewish New World Order.
Then the Helsinki television cable, which is owned by Sanoma WSOY, provides the European Music Television, which is the Jewish for gentiles pop and rap culture channel, and the Eurosport TV channel. There were some less-mainstream Finnish TV channels on the HTV cable also, but the content they provided was mostly rubbish (my personal opinion) and the channels aren’t alive anymore. One of these latter mentioned supplied pornography during late nights to the Finnish nation.
All in all most Finns are pretty happy with the overwhelming Jewish television entertainment and of course 95% are happily ignorant oF the fact that the television doesn’t reflect their traditional values. Though since the social democrats have managed to demolish the traditional family unit, there are really very little Finnish values left in the average urban family to cherish, let alone in the upcoming new multiculturally aware, highly educated, utterly underpaid and highly ignorant working families.
At this point I recommend: http://www.nicehouse.fi/median_maail…s/herkman.html, a page about the Sanoma WSOY and Alma Media monopoly. Also there is in English partly similar text at: http://www.uta.fi/viesverk/fmcs/convergence/herkman.htm .
Radio in Finland (my insights are rather limited here).
YLE has channels ranging from news to entertainment, many of which seem to be suffering from the lack of listeners. Then there are the commercial, pop-culture, 12-year-old-prostitution-encouraging channels like Kiss-FM and Energy, both of which are part of different multinational media corporations (Lack of resources to find out about Jewish ownership, it being highly likely).
Alma Media runs Radio Nova, which is a pop-culture station for the adults.
Newspapers.
First of all we have the Finland’s biggest and the most respected newspaper, Helsingin Sanomat, which is owned by Sanoma WSOY. It has the usual perspective: pro-multinational corporations, pro-European Union, pro-Nato, anti-nationalistic and of course pro-Israel.
It is highly aligned with the Finland’s most prominent political party, the Social Democrats. Erkko also made money with prostitution advertisements until just a few years ago when a feminist group managed to force Helsingin Sanomat to drop the adverts by canceling subscriptions.
The next biggest daily newspaper is Aamulehti (“Morning paper”), which is an Alma Media publication.
Of the rest of the mainstream business or newspapers, most are owned by Alma and WSOY. In the north there are still some important independent regional newspapers, like Kaleva, but –
Quote:
| I don’t think there are any important newspapers having a non-democratic or non-Jewish point of view. |
There are exactly two competing evening newspapers, Iltalehti and Iltasanomat, owned by Alma Media and Sanoma WSOY respectively. They are designed for the stupid masses with Jewish for gentiles values, and thus most educated people think them as entertaining rubbish made solely for the purpose of making money.
Most people fail to realize that making money is generally not an objective, it is a means to an end and for the Jews it is all better to make money while destroying the Finnish/Western culture.
Also, there are exactly two competing business newspapers, Taloussanomat and Kauppalehti, owned by WSOY and Alma Media respectively.
Sanoma WSOY also owns Sanoma Magazines Finland Oy, Finland’s biggest magazine print, which is responsible for publications such as the Cosmopolitan (For young European women), Gloria (“lifestyle” magazine for women), Me naiset (“We the women”) and Donald Duck (which was turned into Jewish propaganda after Walt Disney’s death and Disney’s fall into Jewish ownership).
Sanoma Magazines also publishes magazines throughout western Europe.
The next biggest magazine publisher is Yhtyneet Kuvalehdet Oy, which publishes material such as Anna (Women’s magazine), Painonvartijat (Fitness magazine. The last issue had a cover picture of a popular mulatto, (Lola), 2 plus (Baby magazine, I can’t say anything about it), Suosikki (“Popular”, looks like to be a rap culture magazine for teenagers), Seura (“Company”, family magazine about popular culture and celebrities) and Suomen Kuvalehti (“Finland’s picture magazine”).
All in all Yhtyneet Kuvalehdet at least has noticeably less directly corrupting publications than Sanoma Magazines. Yhtyneet Kuvalehdet Oy is part of the Otava-Kuvalehdet Oy, which is completely owned by the secretive Swedish Olli Reenpää family. The founder of Otava was Hannes Gebhard in 1890 (Jewish surname from Poland), but I’m not sure if Olli Reenpää is related.
The next owner was Alvar Rengvist, who is the grandfather of Olli Reenpää (The family has changed its surname from Swedish to Finnish one, Rengvist -> Reenpää). http://www.otava-kuvalehdet.fi/images/ollireenpaa.jpg at least he does not look like a Finn, but a Swede or a Jew.
Otava-Kuvalehdet also runs the Finland’s second biggest book printing. The biggest is [of course] WSOY, owned of by Sanoma WSOY Oy.
The monopoly of Sanoma WSOY and Alma Media is staggering, truly a giant propaganda machine for The Big Lie, but the situation is similar throughout U.S. and Europe, and thus this is nothing special. According to the herkman link given earlier, in 1980 the majority of the mass-media was still controlled by the parliament and the current situation is the result of the development of the last twenty-five years, even though the commercial media held a prominent position even back then. Perhaps this might explain partly why Finland still has a relatively homogeneous people – the mass media started effectively pushing multiculturalism and Jewish-for-gentiles values only some twenty or twenty five years ago.
Naturally this also means that the current generations have lived all their lives influenced by these medias and thus race-mixing is going to skyrocket if a lot of Negroes are let into Finland in the coming years.
Finnish athlete Markus Poyhonen. Girls, enjoy!
Markus Poyhonen winning a 100-meter sprint (with TV narration by an Austrian or Bavarian speaking in German).
…
For Finnish reading people, below you can read a speech of Aatos Erkko, where he talks about the need of privatization of Finnish infrastructure, such as the post service and railroads, the need for urbanization, the need for European Union and Euro, the need for Nato, the joys of social democracy and manipulating of the youth for healthy values. He promises that if Finns follow his advice – they can have success in the New World Order. http://www.saunalahti.fi/merniemi/hpark/erkkoa.htm
Legal situation
Finland is a republic with a constitution, although unlike in the United States of America, the constitution means very little in Finland. The Parliament can change it when needed (and often does – 5/6 and 2/3 majorities are needed to do this quickly) and laws seemingly can be unconstitutional yet accepted.
As in most European countries, Finland has a law that restricts constitutional free speech when it comes to races, Jews or immigration:
Quote:
| “Agitation against a group of citizens is prohibited” with a prison sentence of up to two years in jail or fines. |
Lately this was used against a publisher, who published a book which mentions the Russian Czar family and their Jewish murderers. He got three hundred Euros in fines. Even mentioning the Jews, the Erkko family or Alma Media in a bad light can get one in a trouble, and in a blacklist, which effectively bans you from WSOY and Alma media corporations and thus from a career of a journalist, a writer (to newspapers) or being interviewed in these medias.
As for immigration, there are very clear laws against discrimination. Naturally such laws don’t apply to Jews – no one would dare to bring such an issue to public or hope to win such a case in Finnish court. Now I don’t altogether object to such a law, but the problem lies in letting Zionist Jews and Negroes become Finnish citizens, and this makes the law very problematic.
In a recent event the father of current Finnish prime minister was investigated by the police for possibly agitation when Helsingin Sanomat published in a weekly extra paper an interview with Tatu Vanhanen, who is a co-author of I.Q. and the Wealth of Nations. It looked like an attack on the prime minister and Center party in favor of the Social Democrat party. This has been discussed on Stormfront under other topics. The senior Vanhanen’s interview jump-started a discussion about races and I.Q. in Helsingin Sanomat, where humanists got to ridicule the old racist’s views – humanists who think they could make a professor out of a chimpanzee, if the people weren’t so prejudiced and would give it a fair change.
There was at least one decent opinion published, which noted that I.Q. test score differences between races are in fact, facts.
Also in a recent (September 2, 2004) humorous event during “the nation’s discussion about IQ”, a group of Somalis (Negroes from South-East Africa, the only Negroes with good numbers in Finland) challenged a group of Finns to an IQ test by Mensa. I’ve not seen the show, but it was aired on a MTV3 program for 45 minutes. The cognitive elite of Somalis, all six of them, managed to score reportedly “nearly as much as an average Finn”, meaning 85-95 (STD 24), while the group of high school (?) Finns scored “exceptionally high”, the latter fact being only hastily mentioned during the show.
The data was not shown, but the host, according to an Internet forum, said outside the show that the Finnish kids’ IQ average was on the lower edge of the requirement for Mensa!
Typical Finns in their folk costumes. A typical, trusting, Nordic people who cannot comprehend guile. Whites must learn — they must be specifically taught and have it hammered into them — the alien concept of guile as the psychopath’s way of life. Whites have to be the most naive race on earth.
The conclusion that was drawn by this Jew-dominated show was that the Somalis are on average as intelligent as native Finns. All the true data was later apparently ordered destroyed by the Finnish police.
In summary –
No political party in Finland can exist that is officially against Jewish influence. If there were a national socialist party in Finland, it would have to formulate its critique of the society and media in general terms – omitting facts not unlike the ones I have presented here.
The so-called “agitation law” was obviously made to protect the Jews, and it was passed in 1995 (or at least revised in 1995). (The exact law, in the Finnish language: http://www.heikniemi.net/rikoslaki/rl11.html.)
==============
My final comment:
I know a brave, gifted and dear comrade who wants to leave black-ruled South Africa and move to all-white Finland. But the Jews are bringing in blacks to gang-rape the white girls THERE too.
IT IS TIME TO STOP RUNNING. THE POLICY OF WHITE RETREAT HAS FAILED.
When a psychopathic bully senses weakness, he always advances all the faster. The more we retreat, the faster they push forward.
WE MUST FORM THE WHITE TRIBE.
Not a bunch of white individuals who privately, or on forums, express racial thoughts in total social, economic, cultural and physical isolation, weakness and ostracism.
Stay tuned. THIS YEAR.
__________________
A comrade suggested I was an anglophile WASP.
========I replied:
Me? An Anglo?
Pan-British Isles if ever there was one — a Norman, a Saxon, a Scot, and a Catholic Irishman. (Have not yet found any Welshmen or Cornish in my woodpile. But both my grandfathers were dark-haired Kelts, both grandmothers blondes.)
Castle Nugent, Delvin, Ireland
You are making some important contributions to our appreciation of Argentina as a white bastion, a point fort, a “strong point,” as the French would say.
I do fear, though, that Argentina has a far more powerful Jewish community than you realize. And with the whole ruling elite infamous for its utter corruption, the Jews have “dirt files” on everyone in power.
Look how BaconEating Jew attacks me with buckets of his “dirt soup.” The two Google Jews (Sergei Brin and Larry Page) put his concocted merde of pure lies and three-quarter-lies at the very top of the first page when you use the Google search engine. “Search” for a needle of truth in that haystack. And my 1,000+ posts on various forums are hardly mentioned!
In Deutschtown, the once all-German Northside of Pittsburgh.
And WHERE is my YouTube site?
The Jews ALWAYS sling personal dirt — real, imagined, exaggerated or “one half the story” — if they cannot defeat us on our facts.
And they can NEVER defeat us on the facts. The facts are that they are a race of manipulative, arrogant, lying psychopaths, and YES, Mel Gibson was RIGHT, they start the world’s most horrible wars, Iraq being just the latest disastrous bloodbath.
When I come out of the starting gate, prepare to learn that I am the worst monster who ever lived. After Adolf Hitler. It is a great compliment to be that hated and that feared by psychopaths — who are betraying and misleading the little Jews and steering them toward their next doom.
God, make us Thy servants in the battles that approach, not for our will, but ever for Thine.
__________________
From the May 9, 2008 Daily Mail (Britain) story on the monster who kept his daughter in a dungeon for 24 years, raping her and fathering seven children by her.
[www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=564753&in_page_id=181 1}
Comrades Michael Walsh and John de Nugent are just asking a question . . . .
---------
It could be that certain brainwashed neo-Austrians think it is "cool" to use Jewish symbols.
I can say this: Amstetten is, as the Daily Mail story states, about 90 miles from Hitler's birthplace. Fritzl, even more than other Austrians bombarded by "the Holocaust" ad nauseam on TV, surely knows what a Star of David looks like.
__________________
pictures from Helpdeskland
THIS IS INDIA.
IT'S WHERE YOU CALL WHEN YOU HAVE
A TECHNICAL PROBLEM WITH YOUR COMPUTER.
__________________
a great professor, Macdonald, withstands Jew attacks
from the May 9, 2008 Jewish Journal of Los Angeles,
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=19351
The professor the anti-Semites love. Kevin MacDonald, Cal State Long Beach, and the downside
[sez this Jew Greenberg] of academic freedom
By Brad A. Greenberg, Senior Writer
=============
This is what I found about this Jew Greenberg, who calls himself a Christian but, being a racially loyal Jew, bashes Macdonald.[sic]
Name: Brad A. Greenberg
Location: Los Angeles
A God-fearing Christian with devilishly good Jewish looks, I write about the intersection of faith and life for The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Email me at thecreator@thegodblog.org
=============
Professor Kevin MacDonald, PhD. Photo by David Sprague
Kevin MacDonald had just completed the first in a series of books that would come to define him. Awaiting feedback from his publisher 15 years ago, MacDonald sent his manuscript to a colleague in the psychology department at California State University Long Beach (CSULB). The feedback was not encouraging.
“What troubles me most is that your criticism of Jews may be taken seriously by groups and individuals who both fear and hate Jews,” Martin Fiebert wrote in a 12-point reply. “Your manuscript, unintentionally perhaps, reinforces the stereotype that all Jews, be they assimilated or not, are clannish, deceptive, and exploitive. I’m sure you would be dismayed to find that your book has a treasured place in the bookcases of neo-Nazis along with Mein Kampf‘ and the Protocols of Zion.
How prophetic Fiebert’s insight turned out to be.
Quote:
| MacDonald, 64, has been deemed America’s “foremost anti-Semitic thinker” by civil rights experts. |
A tenured psychology professor who lent his expertise to Holocaust denier David Irving, MacDonald has suggested restricting college enrollment and increasing taxes for Jews to mediate what he perceives as inequities with non-Jewish whites.
His three-volume critique of Judaism as a “group evolutionary strategy” – — known collectively as “The Culture of Critique” and published by Praeger in 1994, 1998 and 1998 — claims the religion discourages inclusion, eggs on anti-Semitism and uses study of Talmud to thin the reproduction of less intelligent members. The books have become sacred scripture for white supremacists, and a growing number of MacDonald’s colleagues have urged the university to denounce his writings.
“He is repackaging traditional anti-Jewish beliefs in contemporary pseudo-scientific language,” said Jeffrey Blutinger, a history professor leading the push against MacDonald. “If you think of classic anti-Jewish tropes of Jews as clannish, conspiratorial, opposed to Christendom, a threat to the nation, using contemporary ideas as a way of undermining traditional beliefs — all of these show up in his writing.”
Why is this Jew smiling? Well, he is 2) defaming someone and 2) denying their freedom of speech. Vhat’s not to like?
These are strange credentials for a man who in person seems every bit a slice of Midwest Americana. Part German, part Scottish, raised to be a traditional Catholic, though he is now agnostic, MacDonald was reared in a small Wisconsin town best known for the children’s clothes that carry its name.
“Oshkosh was a great town to grow up in,” MacDonald said in a recent conversation. “There weren’t any Jewish families at all. I guess there was one; I knew one Jewish kid in high school. Nobody talked about Jews.
There was no anti-Semitism in town. It was an unknown.”
He first discovered his future research subjects as an undergraduate at the University of Wisconsin in Madison.
Chapman Hall, University of Wisconsin, one of the nation’s best public universities, founded in a the nation’s most heavily German-settled state — 53% German. MacDonald grew up in Oshkosh, Wisconsin of Scottish and German blood. His bachelor’s degree was earned here, and his master’s and PhD degrees from U. Connecticut. Now, wouldn’t the Jews like to say we all are “trailer-park,” but they cannot.
He had a few Jews as roommates, and many more were fellow travelers in the anti-war movement. Almost three decades later, when MacDonald began connecting Jewish power and success to evolutionary strategies, he would identify his leftist years as the first time Jews used his gentile face to promote what he considered their group agenda. It wasn’t until the ’90s that MacDonald began to see Jewish communities as inimical entities slowly destroying their hosts.
“Jews are inevitably going to be an elite,” he said. “They are smart; they are well organized. The problem, from my point of view, is that there is a hostility there, a fear and hostility, that over the past 40 years has resulted in some changes that have not been in the interest of people like me. As simple as that.”
MacDonald’s core complaint is Jewish influence on immigration laws. He blames passage of the 1965 Immigration Act, which abolished national origin quotas and made immigration easier for non-Westerners, on a Jewish desire to oust European Americans from the majority.
Congressman Emanuel Celler, a Jew who “served” for over 50 years, shepherded the 1965 Immigration Reform Act through Congress. (His partner in crime was the WASP-hating senator Ted Kennedy, whose father Joe had taught him to hate the Anglo white elites, who had hindered his entry into Harvard and oppressed the Irish in their homeland for centuries.)
“European people in this country will be a minority in a few years,”
MacDonald said. “I don’t think that would have happened if we had had a sense of ourselves as a culture worth defending. Now, everything is up for grabs.”
He sat for the first of two interviews in his cramped office on campus. Tall and lanky, with white hair and a disarming smile, MacDonald hardly looks like America’s scariest academic. He is affable, even in light of the vilification he’s received, much of it from — and this shouldn’t surprise — Jewish peers and organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
Note the globe of the whole world between the ADL’s A-shaped legs. A little subliminal imagery.
“Everybody who crosses them, they are going to have a price to pay,” MacDonald said. “People won’t be seen with me; they won’t talk to me; they won’t have lunch with me. I am pretty much a nonentity around here.”
Until 2000, MacDonald was largely unknown on campus. Testifying for Irving in a lawsuit against Jewish historian Deborah Lipstadt attracted a flurry of attention. But then the storm quieted, and MacDonald was left alone to develop and detail his theories on Jewish strategies to “destroy” Western culture, typing out page after page in his office on the fourth floor of CSULB’s 1970s-era psych building.
“He is not the type of guy who is going to dress up in a KKK outfit or swastika armband. The truth is that with his Ph.D and this veneer of respectability, he’s very dangerous,” said Heidi Beirich, who directs SPLC’s research and special projects.
[JdN comments: This is a typical subtle Jew slur. When I ran for US Congress in 1990, you trotted out your Leonard Zeskin to say the same canard about how I was hiding my trailer-park hate behind "a three-piece suit." Hebrews, let me remind you that pride in being white and opposition to Judaism was the NORMAL, STANDARD, ESTABLISHMENT viewpoint for 2,000 years -- until you took over our mass media and fired al dissenters to your dictates. Proof? You self-contradicting Jews put out yourselves reams of literature on how horribly, irremediably antisemitic our Western civilization, the Church, and most great figures of our history have always been. Kevin MacDonald represents the mainstream view for the last 20 centuries. It is YOU who have driven the default position of Western leaders --- antisemitism -- underground -- temporarily.]
“The Nazi types are reading his stuff like it is the Bible,” Beirich continued, “and they’re using it to say why Jews should be exterminated, why they should be thrown out of the country — because he says Jews are responsible for all this immigration that is destroying white culture.
His books are like the new Bible of the movement.”
Last spring, Beirich wrote a scathing profile of MacDonald for SPLC’s magazine, Intelligence Report, and the local chapter of the ADL became more active in raising awareness. Then earlier this year, the ground ruptured beneath MacDonald when a few uneasy colleagues from a range of academic departments coalesced and began to urge CSULB President F. King Alexander to distance the school from its infamous academic.
[JdN comments: I tried to find a mugshot of this Heidi Beirich witch who persecutes American professors in their own country for Greater Israel, but this very prominent SPLC thuggette has no image on either Google Images or Altavista. Hmmm. That hideous? A face, as they say, made for radio? ]
Alexander so far has declined all such requests on the basis of academic freedom.
“Despite the fact that I personally disagree and even find deplorable some beliefs and opinions expressed by a few individuals on our campus, particularly those ideas that are hurtful of certain groups, I believe as Thomas Jefferson stated, that ‘errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it,’” Alexander, who declined to be interviewed, said in a written statement.
“Universities should always ensure that good ideas always outweigh bad ideas,” he continued. “Universities should also be firmly committed, even at times when it is against popular opinion, to freedom of thought, and when we act to restrict opinion from the far right or the far left, then it will not be long before we can no longer call ourselves a university.”
But the pressure from the academic community [JdN comments: FROM JEWS] to condemn MacDonald continues. During the past six weeks, the anthropology and history departments, as well as the Jewish studies program, all have issued statements denouncing MacDonald’s work as “professionally irresponsible and morally untenable”; the psychology department voted to disassociate from his writings because of their popularity with “extremist groups.”
[JdN comments: Macdonald's books are scientifically impeccable. What ulcerates the Zioids is that he endlessly quotes their own writings.]
“His approach to historical investigation is antithetical to our discipline in that he selects only those materials that support his preconceived thesis, while ignoring all evidence to the contrary,” the history faculty’s statement said. “MacDonald’s misuse of historical methodology would be unacceptable in an undergraduate history paper; how much more disturbing, therefore, is the fact that in these writings he is identified as a professor at CSULB.”
MacDonald’s intellectual pursuits began innocently. In 1990, he’d been at Cal State Long Beach five years, teaching and researching child psychological development, when he read an article in the Los Angeles Times about the tight-knit 19th century Jewish community of Cheyenne, Wyo.
“They came with a distinct culture, community activities and forms of cooperation, and they practiced their religious rituals even in the most isolated conditions,” the Times reported. “One child tells how before there was a rabbi in Cheyenne, his father dressed meat in the kosher tradition in the back of his furniture store.”
The article made MacDonald think of animals.
He had graduated from the University of Wisconsin in 1966 with a degree in philosophy and dreams of being a jazz musician. When reality sank in, MacDonald entered graduate school at the University of Connecticut in the mid-’70s, earning a master’s in biology and then, four years later, a doctorate in biobehavorial science.
His research focused on the personalities of wolves, and by the time he left U. Conn in 1981 to pursue a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Illinois, MacDonald was convinced that, like the lab wolves he’d studied, human behavioral tendencies also led back to specific genetic blueprints. And that is where his mind wandered when he read about Cheyenne’s Jews.
“My adviser, Benson Ginsburg, wrote an article saying that wolves would be a better model for human behavior than chimpanzees, because of social bonds and their acting like a family,” MacDonald said. “They have to police the boundaries and police in-group behavior; you can’t have freeloaders. My earliest research on the behavior of Jews focused on that, and you see wolf packs do that.”
MacDonald began to think of Judaism as the vehicle through which an evolutionary strategy was mechanized. He decided to read Paul M. Johnston’s A History of the Jews and the Tanakh, or as MacDonald knew it, the Old Testament, and within short order, he was mentally outlining “A People that Shall Dwell Alone.”
The book became the first in his series, “The Culture of Critique.” “A People that Shall Dwell Alone” lays the foundation for MacDonald’s theory of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy and briefly discusses other groups that he believes employ similar strategies: Gypsies, the Amish, Chinese living abroad.
[JdN comments: Here is an Amazon link to several superb MacDonald books.]
Jews, he pointed out, are taught they are different — God’s chosen — and they are encouraged to live lives that benefit other Jews. They also marry within the Tribe, and more often their neighbors within their extended family, MacDonald wrote. Focusing on the Ashkenazim of Central and Eastern Europe, he argued that competition for resources benefited Jews who chose niche businesses, like trading and banking.
Quote:
| And in one of his most controversial claims, MacDonald wrote that, over time Jews have grown increasingly successful because of a eugenics program built into the religion — Talmud study, which helped determine which men got the prettiest wives, the best business opportunities and the most children. “These documents contain a vast amount of material for which there are no practical functions at all,” MacDonald wrote. |
“The incredible elaboration of Jewish religious law in these writings suggests that this mass of material is the result of intense intellectual competition within the Jewish community and that the resulting Torah then provided an arena for intellectual competition within the Jewish community.”
The second volume, Separation and its Discontents, offers an
evolutionary explanation for anti-Semitism, from the late Roman Empire to modern Diaspora life, and discusses Jewish strategies for combating discrimination.
The most controversial portion of this book, Chapter 5, compares Nazism to Judaism.
Quote:
| “The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933-1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism. … It may be usefully conceptualized as a group evolutionary strategy that was characterized by several key features that mirrored Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy.” |
MacDonald concluded that Nazi ideology “may well have been caused or at least greatly facilitated by the presence of Judaism as a very salient and successful racially exclusive antithetical group strategy within German society.”
[JdN comments: The great Hans Schmidt, my mentor on the 1980s, a successful California businessman who was a former soldier in the Adolf Hitler division of the Waffen-SS, once told me: "Without the Jews, there would never have been National Socialism. The Jews help us think about ourselves and our nature and define what an Aryan really is -- by contrast. So we owe them a little thanks, but not much."]
His final volume in the series, The Culture of Critique, focuses on Judaism as a culture of belittling non-Jews and makes broad claims about Jewish dominance in media and the social sciences, identification with radical leftist politics and influence over immigration laws. He argues in the preface to the paperback edition (2002) that Jewish intellectuals and influentials have discovered, and are committed to, the best strategy for “destroying Europeans”: convincing them of their own moral bankruptcy.
Quote:
| “And thus,” he wrote, “the intense effort among Jewish intellectuals to continue the ideology of the moral superiority of Judaism and its role as undeserving historical victim while at the same time continuing the onslaught on the moral legitimacy of the West.” |
MacDonald’s newest addition to this library, Cultural Insurrections, was published last month by Occidental Press. The book is a compilation of his essays from the past few years, with topics ranging from “Stalin’s Willing Executioners” to “What Makes Western Culture Unique.”
In the book’s final essay — “Can the Jewish Model Help the West Survive?” — MacDonald embraces Jewish “hyper-ethnocentrism” as a strategy to fight the “onslaught” of immigration that he believes has increased ethnic competition for resources and threatens white European American culture.
“We already see numerous examples in which coalitions of minority groups attempt to influence public policy, including immigration policy, against the interests of the European majority. And we must realize that placing ourselves in a position of vulnerability would be extremely risky, given the deep sense of historical grievance harbored by many ethnic activists toward Europeans,” MacDonald wrote.
“This is especially the case with Jews, and of course Jews have shown a tendency to become part of the elite in Western societies. We have recently seen reports in the press of religious Jews spitting on Christian symbols in Israel, thereby resurrecting an age-old Jewish practice. Indeed, hatred toward all things European is normative among a great many strongly identified Jews.”
In fact, there were reports from Ha’aretz and Christianity Today in 2004 of a spate of spitting incidents in Jerusalem, in which ultra-Orthodox Jews allegedly assaulted Christians. However, spitting, like the blood libel that claims Jews ritually slaughter Christian children and bake their blood into matzah, is not and never has been an “age-old Jewish practice.”
[JdN comments: Really? All a “libel”? Then why did the son of the Grand Rabbi of Rome, a tenured professor of medieval history at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, Ariel Toaff, PhD, say in a 148-page book replete with footnotes, published in 2007, called Blood Passover that the ritual murder of Christian boys is NOT a libel, but in fact literally, horribly true and that the Catholic Inquisition was extremely fair in investigating and validating this issue? That popes bent over backward to NOT libel the Jews, but surrendered to massive evidence from renegade Jews themselves that there WAS ritual murder of Christian children?]
==========continued in next post================
__________________
Most of the essays for “Cultural Insurrections” appeared in The Occidental Quarterly, a Mount Airy, Md.-based journal that “unapologetically defends the cultural, ethnic, and racial interests of Western European peoples.” In 2004, the journal awarded MacDonald a $10,000 prize.
“MacDonald’s ‘racism’ is nothing more than the idea that European-descended peoples have as much right as any other people, including Jews, to preserve their people and their culture,” Virginia Abernethy, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at Vanderbilt University and, like MacDonald, an editorial adviser to The Occidental Quarterly, wrote in the book’s foreword.
[JdN comments: Gee, professor of psychiatry at Vanderbilt. Another trailer-park ignorant racist.]
MacDonald’s research rests on the assumption, based on interpretations of intelligence tests, that Jews are born with superior brains. The intelligence quotient sits on a sliding scale, with the average IQ at 100. The average IQ of Ashkenazi Jews, however, is a whopping 107 to 115, at the median higher than 70 percent of people, according to a few contested, though oft-cited, studies by Margaret E. Backman (1972), Julius S. Romanoff (1976) and Richard Lynn (2004).
The results have been dramatic: Freud, Einstein, Dylan. In the second half of the 20th century, Jews received 29 percent of the Nobel Prizes, while accounting for only 13 million of the world’s 6 billion inhabitants — about two-tenths of a percent.
[JdN comments: There was a powerful movement for eugenics across the white, Western world in the 1880s-1930. Theodore Roosevelt was a leading proponent and wrote about eugenics at Harvard as a graduate student. Francis Galton of England founded this modern science. It was Jews who quashed this essential movement. For centuries now the brightest have been having the fewest children, and the chimpish results can now be seen in the White House.]
“The profile of disproportionately high Jewish accomplishment in the arts and sciences since the 18th century, the reality of elevated Jewish IQ, and the connection between the two are not to be denied by means of data,” Charles Murray, co-author of the controversial 1994 book, The Bell Curve, which discussed the socioeconomic consequences of racial differences in intelligence, wrote in Commentary magazine last year.
And so we come to the great question: How and when did this elevated Jewish IQ come about?”
There is no accepted explanation. Some researchers have attributed higher IQ to medieval persecution, others to Jewish identity as the People of the Book and a few, maybe flippantly, to the fruits of being God’s chosen.
But how researchers answer that same question depends heavily upon what school of thought they come from. Evolutionary psychologists like MacDonald credit better Jewish genes, while traditional biologists argue heightened IQ is the result of nurture, not nature.
“Jews may have been able to actualize their intelligence differently than other groups because we have an enormous, 5,000-year cultural history prizing learning and achievement, ” said Richard M. Lerner, a
critic of MacDonald who directs the Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development at Tufts University. “There is no innateness.”
Few people would deny that Jews number strongly among the American elite, but very few American Jews want to talk about it. Among those who will is J.J. Goldberg, author of the authoritative 1996 book, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment.
“A lot of the politics of Jewish advocacy, minority advocacy in general, is victimhood,” Goldberg said in an interview. “You can’t do that if you are not actually a victim. There are some people who think Jews are powerless and others, like Kevin MacDonald, think that Jews control everything. In fact, the truth is somewhere in the middle.”
Another journalist eager to discuss this topic is Philip Weiss, who writes the blog, Mondoweiss, and, unlike Goldberg, is an anti-Zionist who can be a brutal critic of his co-religionists. In December,
MacDonald mentioned Weiss on his Web site, kevinmacdonald. net, where he links to his articles about Jews and Western culture and writes lengthy responses to critics. MacDonald praised Weiss as a fellow traveler. On his own blog, Weiss quickly rejected the embrace.
“He is trying to examine some important ideas. I just wish he wasn’t racist about it,” Weiss said in an interview, adding, “There was scrutiny of Jewish power in Central Europe when the Nazis arose. Therefore there is no ability to scrutinize Jewish power now because it makes you a Nazi. But I think that it is a legitimate intellectual and journalistic exercise to scrutinize Jewish power. I know MacDonald is engaged in that, and I respect that. But it is his generalizations about Jews that I find disturbing.”
Broad brushing, a central criticism of MacDonald’s work, is a professional hazard in evolutionary psychology, a field of study whose legitimacy has been fiercely contested. For its advocates, it is scientific research that applies Darwinian principles to human behavior.
[JdN comments: In the famous Leni Riefenstahl documentary Triumph of the Will, Rudolf Hess, before introducing Adolf Hitler, says that “national socialism is biology applied to society,” i.e., sociobiology, a term very similar in thrust to evolutionary psychology.]
Opponents liken it to Rudyard Kipling’s “Just So Stories, ” which explained contemporary phenomena with fantastic ontological accounts that traced the maze backward.
Nevertheless, MacDonald was once a respected member of this community. His first book was fairly well reviewed, though the second less so and the third almost not at all. From 1995 to 2001, he served as the elected secretary-archivist of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society. That organization’ s president would come to repudiate MacDonald as an “embarrassment.”
[JdN comments: No, sir, the embarrassment comes from your shameful cowardice, to attack your own respected colleague and boot-lick to the Jews who are the enemies of your country -- and of your whole field of study.]
The theoretical viewpoint expressed in MacDonald’s books stands in the most extreme contradiction to nearly every contentful core claim of evolutionary psychology,” said John Tooby, co-director of the Center for Evolutionary Psychology at UC Santa Barbara and a pioneer in the field.
Tooby’s comment, which appeared on Slate.com, was prompted by MacDonald’s decision on Jan. 31, 2000, to enter a British courtroom as an expert witness on Jewish behavior. On that day, MacDonald explained his belief that Jewish activists conspire against individuals who threaten the group interest, a model he alleged had been used to suppress, after publication, Irving’s biography of Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.
“Yes, I think that anti-Semitism is, you know, a perennial problem, and Jewish organizations have developed very sophisticated ways of dealing with it,” MacDonald said, in what ended up being a very short testimony. “This is one way of dealing with it. Anti-Semitism or any anti-Semitism is fought very, very intensely. They take it very seriously, and they do quite a job, obviously, of suppressing it, yes.”
That statement surprised Irving, who didn’t like being called an anti-Semite in court, and those few minutes have dogged MacDonald since.
On his Web site and that of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), a Holocaust-denying organization based in Newport Beach –
[JdN comments: WRONG, not “denial” (as in “being in denial” or as in “denying reality”) but rather debunking and total refutation. The reason why Jews give five and ten and twenty-year sentences for Holocaust debunking is because there was no Holocaust, PERIOD. [Except the Bolshevik Jewish holocaust of 40,000,000 innocent white, Christian Ukrainians and Russians 1917-1957.]]
– MacDonald presented a lengthy explanation for why he agreed to testify. He claimed that Lipstadt, following a pattern of Jewish activism, had “attempted to prevent the publication of writings conflicting with their constructions of reality” and exaggerated Irving’s Holocaust denial.
MacDonald also appealed to the academic importance of Irving’s book, Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich. “He had access to original documents in the Soviet Union that nobody knew about. It was the kind of thing that any historian would have to read. And yet it was rescinded; they actually took it off the shelf. I thought that was ridiculous, just activism stuff,” MacDonald added in an interview. “It was just suppression of free speech.”
In Lipstadt’s memoir, “History on Trial,” she recalled the surprise of learning an expert on anti-Semitism would be a witness against her. “I could not fathom,” she wrote, “how a specialist on anti-Semitism would voluntarily testify on Irving’s behalf, unless, I thought — facetiously — somehow he’s for it.”
Cal State Long Beach’s Jewish studies program is located about 100 yards from Psych 417 on the second floor of a collection of history and sociology offices that looks 70 years old and smells older. The program is identified by a cork board adjacent to the office of co-director Jeffrey Blutinger, who teaches Jewish intellectual and cultural history and post-communist Holocaust memorialization. Waiting outside, visitors are entertained by the printed phrases of “Jewish Buddhists” — “If
there is no self, whose arthritis is this?” and “Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.” — and satirical headlines from a backdated issue of The Onion — “Fuehrer’s Slaughter of Millions Blamed on Serious Self-Esteem Issues.”
Blutinger’s office is stuffed with six bookcases full of Jewish history, from Heinrich Graetz to pioneer Jews of the American West. And lumped on a pile of binders beneath the Encyclopedia Judaica lay first editions of MacDonald’s first two books, checked out from the university library, and borrowed copies of The Culture of Critique and Understanding Jewish Influence, an Occidental Quarterly monograph containing three MacDonald essays.
A former lawyer who joined the faculty four years ago, Blutinger has emerged as a leader in the battle against MacDonald, urging colleagues across campus to join the fight and authoring the Jewish studies’ program statement denouncing MacDonald’s research and the appended 18-page explanation.
“It’s important that we take a stand,” Blutinger said. “I teach the Holocaust every fall, and the thing I always end the course with is that, God willing, we will never have to make the choice people did back then, but all of us face the choice between what’s right and doing what is easy or convenient. I tell them that I hope they will do what is right.”
“If we are not willing to stand up when the risks are small,” he continued, “why would we be willing to take a stand when the risks are big?”
Unpopular as MacDonald’s views are, there appears little the university can do. He is protected by his status as a tenured professor, which he achieved in 1994, the year the first book in his “Culture of Critique” series was published. MacDonald also received a distinguished faculty award in 1995, and there is no record of any student complaint about anything MacDonald has said in 23 years, the administration, ADL and Hillel all reported.
Cal State Long Beach has been down this road before.
Nearly 30 years ago, Reinhard K. Buchner, a physics professor who from 1980 to 1983 was an editorial adviser for IHR’s now-defunct Journal of Historical Review, drew protests from the ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center. The journal carried such Buchner essays as “The Problem of Cremator Hours and Incineration Time,” which argued, using time-space calculations, that the number of Jews who possibly could have been killed at Auschwitz has been exaggerated.
Buchner eventually returned to Germany, but a former colleague on the editorial board, Arthur R. Butz, remains in American academia. A long-time associate professor of engineering at Northwestern University, Butz was an early Holocaust denier. In 1976, he wrote The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.
Professor Butz, yet another great American hero of German heritage
[JdN comments: A VERY gutsy book, then and now, and periodically updated.]
Many other tenured scholars, from the lowest to highest levels of academia, use their position to share unsavory opinions. The issue is one of academic freedom, designed to encourage bold research by protecting faculty from the political whims of capricious administrators. And even as it promotes experimental research in every discipline, it also frequently puts universities in uncomfortable positions.
[JdN comments: It was the Prussians who instituted tenure so professors could engage in controversial and non-conformist research, called akademische Freiheit, “academic freedom.”]
MacDonald has publicly warned Cal State Long Beach administrators, responsible for the second-largest student body (population: 37,000) in the country’s largest university system (23 campuses scattered from Arcata to San Diego), that the school could expect a lawsuit if he was terminated without just cause.
[JdN comments: Jews DO understand lawsuits. Famed and feisty Scottish actor Sean Connery learned early in his Hollywood career to sue every Jew who even had bad breath.]
This is why faculty statements have urged only that the university distance itself from his theories about Jews and his support for ethnostates that create a haven for European American interests. Each of the four departmental statements professed a belief in his freedom to write about whatever he wants.
“We wish to make it clear that we do not seek to impede Kevin MacDonald’s First Amendment rights,” proclaimed the statement from the anthropology department, released April 28. “However, just as he has rights, we have the right, if not the obligation, to denounce his writings on race, ethnicity and intelligence that promote intolerance, as not only inaccurate, but as professionally irresponsible and morally untenable.”
[JdN comments: “Morally untenable”? The Jew pot, defaming as always with its own guilt issues, is calling the kettle black.]
In the second of two recent interviews, MacDonald said he is not a fan of anti-Semitism. But he also described his opinions on a Palestinian American TV news program in 2005 as “rational” anti-Semitism and has joked that being branded a Jew hater was a “badge of honor,” the knee-jerk reaction of a scared Jewish establishment.
The chief concern over MacDonald’s writings about Jews is directed at his fan base: white supremacists like Stormfront.org and Vanguard News Network — whose motto is “No Jews. Just Right.” The members of these online communities have become his loudest defenders, often in language that is as offensive as possible.
“So the goddam Kikes are getting their way yet again, putting the thumbscrews to a White scholar whose ass they are not worthy to lick…. At least this oppression proves that Prof. MacDonald’s great work is hitting the scum hard,” a Vanguard commenter wrote in February below a republished story about MacDonald from CSULB’s student paper.
“How much more of this humiliation is our race going to take? How long before this motherf—ing plague of repulsive, hook-snouted ticks is given a real Zyklon fumigation, as opposed to the fairy tale one?”
[JdN comments: I wonder what Jews sit around and say about us? We know what the Bolsheviks Jews did to our people in Russia and Ukraine – mass-murdered them.]
The Holodomor, the Jewish “killing by hunger” holocaust of between two and four MILLION or more white Christian Ukrainians. If a peasant owned three cows, he was denounced by the Soviet-Jewish media as a “filthy kulak” (landowner!) by these inveterate “labellers” — and all his food was confiscated, ALL of it, at gunpoint. Grain was even exported outy of the country by Stalin’s willing Jewish executioners while Ukrainian children dropped like flies. The Jew York Times‘s Jew reporter Walter Duranty concealed the Holodomor from the worried American public.
A Holodomor child. In March 2008, despite Jewish “scholarly” disagreement, the Ukrainian parliament decreed that the Holodomor was a program of “genocide.” I recommend that all read the VHO summary of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Hundred Years Together – a massive work by a Nobel Laureate that, strangely, has never published in English! — about the gigantic Jewish role in Bolshevik atrocities.
In June 2007, Russia’s then-president Vladimir Putin traveled to the datcha of Alexander Solzhenitsyn outside Moscow — and bestowed on the great Cossack intellectual and anti-communist hero the highest medal of the Russian Federation.
MacDonald repudiated such rhetoric as “crazy stuff” but said he supports the ideology behind it.
“White people have legitimate ethnic interests. To the extent that that is all they believe, then we are on the same page,” he said. “I don’t like to use words like white supremacists. You could say that Koreans in Korea are Korean supremacists if they want to maintain their culture. It is kind of a loaded word; it is a politically charged word of the left, basically, to pathologize any sense of having an ethnicity and culture by people like me. I reject that.”
“I certainly reject the tactics and the rhetoric of these people. It’s very crude,” MacDonald added. “But to the extent that David Duke is trying to advance a white ethnic interest and so on, I don’t have any problem with that.”
[JdN comments: MacDonald is a giant. And his books will terrify you. One gets the sense of a giant, malevolent, parasitical life form whose tentacles penetrate and choke off all white life, powered by high IQs and swimming in oceans of money. A chilling, brilliant and real diagnosis of the enemy – and of us, the trusting NON-psychopaths, who must learn a new strategy and a new way of thinking -- evolutionary psychology -- against an unprecedented threat. HAIL this stalwart white hero!]
__________________
John de Nugent Radio Show Tuesdays and Fridays 9-10:30 pm EDT/6-7:30 pm Pacific & archived!
Last Friday’s John de Nugent Show got more rave views, and I thank all who sent me their feedback!
At www.enationalist.com/radio you can hear it NOW!
(For an mp3 of the show, send me a private message or email me at john@johndenugent.com
1) My first guest was a highly successful Greek immigrant to the Washington DC area, the home remodeler Pete Papas. We discussed why the Greeks were listed by a 2004 Jewish study as the “most antisemitic and xenophobic country in the European Union,” why Greek Orthodox priests are married men with children, the part-Greek Jew Nicolas Sarkozy, now the failed and despised president of France (of all places), and how as a budding artist imbued with ancient Hellenic notions of “the good and the beautiful,” he fought Jewish art professors who insisted he do “modern [abstract] art” without learning the craft first of realistic depiction of the human and other forms.
2) Our second guest, Richard London of Los Angeles, is the author of an astounding, very readable study, The Religion of Macho
AmazonHere is a sample (one page and 30 pp) of his amazing conclusion, backed by mountians of apparently hard evidence that at every major victory for blacks in the black “civil rights struggle” (1957/the Little Rock (Arkansas) High School forced integration, 1964/Civil Rights Act and 1968/Anti-Housing Discrimination) there was an enormous upsurge in the crime rate among whites.
London posits that whites were learning to act like blacks and admire them as the dominant and coming force in society, as role models to emulate.
London was raised in ultra-liberal Berkeley, California, and peceives the New left as having replaced Jesus with the secular religion of The Noble, Suffering Black as their messiah, and just as Jesus rose through crucifixion to glory, so whites should see blacks as the rightful rulers of society, “to atone for white sins.”
An amazing, surprising, well-thought out book– and a good read. A unique work of sociobiology.
Our next show will feature author Harrell Rhome, PhD of Texas, author, under the nom de guerre Philip de Vier, of the devastating blockbuster Blood Ritual.
REVIEWS OF THE 2001 EDITION.
1) JERRY ABBOTT’s REVIEW OF BLOOD RITUAL
This review was featured on the Internet and on the back cover of the 2001 edition. Other than Dr. William Pierce himself, Jerry was our main contact while working on the final form of the manuscript. Visit his useful and informative website www.jabpage.org/.
On April 1, 1899, the body of 19-year-old Agnes Hurza, a Christian young woman, was found in a wood near Polna, Bohemia, then a part of Austria-Hungary. Her throat had been slashed so badly that she was nearly decapitated. Her wounds revealed that she had been held upside down until her body had been emptied of blood. As this blood was not found at the crime scene, it must have been collected and carried away.
On February 5, 1840, Father Thomas, a Catholic priest living in Damascus, went missing. An investigation revealed that he had paid a visit to a barber and bloodletter named Suliman, in the Jewish quarter of the city. Jews later confessed to the crime and told authorities where the body would be found: inside a covered water pipe. It had the marks of ritual murder upon it.
On March 21, 1475, a two-year-old boy named Simon disappeared. He was last seen alive (by Christian eyes) in the company of Jews. A few days later, Jews “discovered” Simon’s body floating in a river. Had he fallen in and drowned? The boy’s body was naked, recently circumcised, and had precise incisions that penetrated major blood vessels.
On March 20, 1144, twelve-year-old William of Norwich, England, was kidnapped by Jews and held overnight at one of their abodes. The next day, he was tied to a cross and gagged, and then tortured in mockery of the suffering of Jesus at his crucifixion, complete with crown of thorns, nails hammered into various parts of his body and a spear thrust into the boy’s side at the end.
Around 1125 BC, a Hebrew named Japhtheh sacrificed his only daughter by burning her to death, in order to satisfy a blood-pact that he had made with God. And for hundreds of years afterward, Hebrews often sacrificed young children by placing them “in the arms of Moloch’s brass furnace that roasted them while their anguished cries were drowned out by the beating of drums.
For most of history, belief in Jewish ritual murder was acceptable and widely accepted. Naturally, the Jews aren’t the only group who has practiced (and might still practice) ritual murder. Historically, it is fairly common: the Aztecs, numerous African tribes, and other ancient peoples come to mind. But since WW2, with the rise of Jewish ownership of the mass media, has come the politically correct “Doctrine of the Never-Guilty Jews.” Every accusation of Jewish ritual murder, no matter how well proved it might have been in its time, has become a “blood libel” in today’s media, a phrase that explicitly frames each case as a malicious falsehood, without an examination of the facts.
Probably, not every accusation is true. But it is also unlikely that all of them are false. Philip de Vier has made a thorough survey of the known evidence in about 200 cases of ritual murder in ancient, medieval, renaissance and modern times. Adopting the approach of a detective investigating a murder, de Vier invites his readers to sift the relevant facts from history and to see that they point toward the existence of a transgenerational ritual murder cult within the larger body of Judaic tradition.
The evidence is persuasive, but, says de Vier, the final verdict is ours to make.
2) A top reviewer for Amazon.com posted the next item on the Amazon book site.
“A Glimpse Into the Darkside.”
January 2, 2005
Reviewer: Pillsky (Pennsylvania) – See all my reviews TOP 1000 REVIEWER)
Blood Ritual by Philip de Vier is a highly controversial book on the charged issue of Jewish ritual murders. It is published by National Vanguard Books, which dispenses a wide variety of titles like this and other controversial literature.
The cover illustration is a woodcut of shady looking men cutting a young woman’s throat on March 29, 1899 in what was then the Austro-Hungarian Empire. An illustration inside shows bearded Middle Eastern-looking men drinking blood out of a child through straws.
For many centuries, Christians (and some Muslims) have accused Jews of performing ritual murders on Christian children and symbolically re-crucifying Christ by desecrating communion wafers (defined as the literal body and blood of Christ according to Roman Catholic dogma).
These incidents usually happened around the time of Easter or the Jewish feast of Purim, a celebration commemorating Jewish vengeance on adversaries from the Old Testament book of Esther in the month of March. I remember reading how the Nuremburg executions were carried out during this time of the year in 1946, and President Bush delivered his ultimatum to Saddam Hussein on Purim in 2003. De Vier presents his material in several sections and he covers a host of topics related to so-called “blood libels:” snuff films, child pornography, Jack the Ripper, Son of Sam, “vampires,” sympathetic magic, Voodoo sacrificial cults and other strange phenomena. First, he establishes what exactly he is discussing and researching in an introduction and from there shows how he will examine the evidence from the material he gathered from studying these bizarre and far-flung cases.
De Vier comes to the following conclusion: there has been a series of ritual murders in various countries, committed by various individuals over a period of many centuries dating from medieval times to possibly the present. Generally a murdered body was found with strange cut marks on it near the times of Easter/Passover and Purim which sometimes let to outbreaks of violence against Jews. The official line of this story is that none of these victims (some of whom were revered as Saints until recently in the Roman Catholic Church) were victims of Jewish violence and that attacks on Jews were motivated by irrational Christian anti-Semitism and racial hatred. To de Vier’s credit, he acknowledges the speculative, open-for-debate nature of this conclusion because it is somewhat (or very, depending on the reader’s biases) controversial and inflammatory. Much of the book consists of de Vier’s timeline of ritual murder cases.
He draws up a “profile” of those likely to commit ritual crime: they tend to have strong motives of vengeance, power drive and psychosexual perversion. De Vier then details ritual murder cases dating from the sacrifice of Jepthah’s daughter (Judges 11) and the human sacrifice cult of Moloch dating from the 900s B.C. to a Brazilian and Italian child pornography ring bust that had international connections in September 2000. The timeline has an encyclopedia of ritual murder cases including the famous cases of Simon of Trent, a young boy found murdered in Italy in 1475 and later revered as a saint by the Church in Italy and William of Norwich, an English boy found with marks suggesting he had been nailed to a cross in 1144.
Other famous cases are covered including the 1899 murder of a young woman in Hungary, Agnes Hurza and the 1840 murder of Fr. Thomas, a Catholic priest in Damascus, Syria. The Fr. Thomas case received very wide press attention worldwide and provoked an investigation by Ottoman authorities. However, the issue was quickly silenced by powerful Jewish diplomatic interests in Europe. There is also a series of very interesting cases surrounding Jack the Ripper’s murders in London during the 1890s. The victims of the Ripper were butchered with strange cuts and ritual marks. Scrawled along the walls near one of the murders was a cryptic message that was quickly erased by the police:
Quote: “The Jewes are not the men to be blamed for nothing.”
The “Son of Sam” killings in New York during the 1970s had ritualistic overtones. David Berkowitz said he was inspired by a demon to kill and the murders may have been committed by more than one gunman based on some evidence.
De Vier’s book also covers the substantial literature produced about ritual murders including the British Nazi Arnold Leese’s pamphlet Jewish Ritual Murder and articles published by one of Hitler’s propagandists, Julius Streicher, in the newspaper Der Sturmer.
A central point to de Vier’s analysis is the fact that ritual murder has existed in many other cultures (or if not cultures, then outright cults and secret societies) and therefore [it is not far-fetched to imagine that it] could also be practiced by Jews against Christians and other opponents.
He cites the medieval Islamic Hashishim (Assassins), India’s Thuggee cult (Thugs), Aztecs, ancient Carthage (a Semitic people descended from Hebrew cousins, the Phoenicians) and African tribes where cannibalism and human sacrifice have been practiced, along with vampirism and related phenomena in the US today.
De Vier also relates another curious example of villagers in Germany sacrificing a child so a bridge would be safe from collapse during the 1800s as a totally irrational relapse back into “Teutonic atavism.” De Vier takes the contemporary, post Vatican II Roman Catholic hierarchy to task for succumbing to Jewish pressure by disbanding the official cult status/Sainthood of victims of ritual murder, notably Simon of Trent.
He calls Vatican II “heretical” because it disavowed thousands of years of traditional imprecations against the Jews in a misguided attempt to “modernize” itself and become “politically correct.” Of course, if the reader does not accept as a priori the Jewish control of the media (or if not “Jewish” control then control by interests sympathetic to organized Judaism and opposed to Christianity) this book will prove extremely offensive. De Vier is careful to note that some accusations were probably false and the results of paranoia and hysteria. However, any reader interested in the dark, conspiratorial, occult and grotesque side of human nature will find much of interest nonetheless.
3) REVIEW BY ERIC THOMSON
Eric Thomson, a well-known Euro-American nationalist author, penned an excellent review. Lack of capitalization of certain words beginning with j is a trademark of this writer.
04 July 2002 — A book review by Eric Thomson, at
http://www.faem.com/eric/2002/et221.htm>http://www.faem.com/eric/2002/et221.htm
For many centuries, Moslems and Christians whose peoples are hosts to jew colonies have found members of their own, fellow Gentiles, who were murdered, their bodies drained of blood via multiple stab wounds. The common characteristic of ritual bloodletting is (1) The victim must be a Goy. (2) The body cannot be concealed, as in buried. (3) The victim must die slowly and painfully, either by kosher slaughter in which the throat is cut, or by multiple stab wounds. (4) The victim’s body is drained of blood combining vampirism with ritual murder.
The author points out that the jews who harbor their practitioners of human sacrifice are unified in their denial of the practice, which they deem “blood libel”. He also reveals that non-jews have long practiced bloodletting rituals, accompanied by fiendish torture of the victims, in the past and in the present, as in today’s African Juju or Voodoo religions, in which these ‘ceremonies’ are similarly reserved for the privileged few believers. The Juju or Voodoo bloodletting rituals are further extended in the Western Hemisphere in the Santeria version of Roman Catholicism. As the author observes, where animal sacrifice is practiced, one finds also human sacrifice. Where animal blood is given magical powers, so is human blood.
The author points out jewish denial of blood rituals, in particular of any consumption of blood, human or otherwise, but they lie, as always. Ritual circumcision (a bris) involves vampire fellatio, in which the mohel, or rabbi who performs the circumcision, sips wine from a ceremonial goblet, then sucks the blood from the infant’s wounded penis, which he spits back into the goblet, which is then passed around to privileged members cf the group, each of whom sips and swallows the contents. The kosher practice of mixing human blood with ritual foods is similarly denied, although jews who converted to other religions confirm that it is indeed the practice.
The author has researched blood rituals and ritual murders from the beginning of recorded history, up to the present. In Western society, the jewish role in such practices is most evident, but other peoples also continue the practice with theme and variations, as we are now experiencing with the massive non-White invasions of our remaining living space. Such are the ‘joys’ of diversity.
The author points out anomalous incidents of bloodletting by notorious serial killers, sparing no group of people as being ‘immune’ from such practices, but these incidents lack the major ingredients of religious blood ritual in terms of continuity and consistency, because such rituals are passed on orally, from generation to generation.
The reader may draw the conclusion that jews who practice such fiendish perversions must be brought to justice, but this can only occur if the jews as a group would identify and denounce the criminals in their midst. Since they do the exact opposite, the logical course for a host people would be collective punishment of all jews, similar to the jews’ punishment of the entire German people in regard to the alleged atrocities of a few Nazis, which we can call “gas libel”. What’s ‘good’ for Germans would be just as ‘good’ for jews, who should begin paying reparations to their injured host peoples, while apologizing for their collective madness, in perpetrating these and other atrocities upon their host peoples and cultures. [. . .]
My own experience confirms the accuracy of the author’s research on this grim subject. During my stay in Toronto, Canada, 4 jews murdered a little Portuguese boy and left his body on a heap of trash on the roof of a building under renovation. In Louisville, KY, a jew got away with a fiendish torture-murder of a “‘shiksa” or Goy female, despite the testimony of an eyewitness, whom the jury entirely disregarded.
The jew denied his crime under oath and was found “not guilty”. When the evidence was later found in his former residence in my neighborhood, it was “inadmissible in terms of “double jeopardy”. The evidence consisted of the blood spattered list of tortures he had inflicted upon his bound victim and Polaroid photos of the victim at each stage of her murder, exactly as the eyewitness had described to the jury. Had the victim been non-White and the perpetrator a White, the ZOG would have tried and retried him until a verdict of “guilty” was reached. Jews have certain privileges in this jew-supremacist society under ZOG, as we should know by now.
==============
Dr. Rhome and I will also discuss the four-Oscar-winning 2007 movie No Country for Old Men about a hit man for the Mexican drug mafia (played by Spanish actor Javier Bardem) pursuing a white Texan who came upon a drugland shootout scene, and then kept $2 million of their drug money. As a lifelong Texan, living in the US-Mexican border area, Dr. Rhome is sure to have interesting comments about this movie, which stars his fellow Texas Tommy Lee Jones.
Scottish actress Kelly MacDonald, a wife who does not kowtow even to a terrifying psychopath.
The Mexican hit man is such a chilling psychopath, and his depredations against innocent whites (as well as fellow Aztecoids) so massive, and so discouraging even to hardened U.S. sheriffs — that my friend Stan Hess called the movie “No Country for White Men.”
I am sure that this will yet another very interesting show, on enationalist.com/radio.
__________________
Comments on this entry are closed.