DEUTSCHE ARTIKEL RECHTS/ARTICLES FRANCAIS A DROITE
=============
The key to remember IMO is that white male conservatives in the military and law enforcement would have to carry out martial law, gun consfiscation, etc. for the negro.
* * *
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=915922&category=OPINI
ON
White Men Shun Democrats
Millions of white men who voted for Barack Obama are walking away from the Democratic Party, and it appears increasingly likely that they’ll take the midterm elections in November with them. Their departure could well lead to
a GOP landslide on a scale not seen since 1994.
For more than three decades before the 2008 election, no Democratic president won a majority of the electorate. In part, that was because of low support — never more than 38 percent — among white male voters. Things changed with Obama, who not only won a majority of all people voting, but also pulled in 41 percent of white male voters.
[JdN: That is still not a majority, brainwashed fool! And only whites are historic Americans; this motley crew of Third Worlders is a horde of United Statesers.]
Polling suggests that the shift was not because of Obama but because of the financial meltdown that preceded the election. It was only after the economic collapse that Obama’s white male support climbed above the 38
percent ceiling. It was also at that point that Obama first sustained a clear majority among all registered voters, according to the Gallup tracking poll.
It looked for a moment as though Democrats had finally reached the men of Bruce Springsteen’s music, bringing them around to the progressive values Springsteen himself has long endorsed. But liberal analysts failed to
understand that these new Democrats were still firmly rooted in American moderation. Pollsters regularly ask voters whether they would rather see a Democrat or Republican win their district. By February, support for
Democrats among white people (male and female) was three percentage points lower than in February 1994, the year of the last Republican landslide.
Today, among whites, only 35 percent of men and 43 percent of women say they will back Democrats in the fall election. Women’s preferences have remained steady since July 2009. But white men’s support for a Democratic Congress has fallen eight percentage points, according to Gallup.
White men have moved away from Obama as well. The same proportion of white women approve of him — 46 percent, according to Gallup — as voted for him in 2008.
[JdN: Which tells you what they Founding Fathers did NOT give women the vote....]
But only 38 percent of white men approve of the President, which means that millions of white men who voted for Obama have now lost faith in him.

The migration of white men from the Democratic Party was evident in the election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts. His opponent, a white woman, won 52 percent of white women. But white men favored Brown by a 60 percent to 38 percent margin, according to Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates polling.
It’s no accident that the flight of white males from the Democratic Party has come as the government has assumed a bigger role, including in banking and health care. Among whites, 71 percent of men and 56 percent of women favor a smaller government with fewer services over a larger government with more services, according to ABC/Washington Post polling.
Obama’s brand of liberalism is exactly the sort likely to drive such voters away. More like LBJ’s than FDR’s, Obama-style liberalism favors benefits over relief, a safety net over direct job programs, health care and
environmental reform over financial reform and a stimulus package that has focused more on social service jobs — health care work, teaching and the like — than on the areas where a majority of job losses occurred:
construction, manufacturing and related sectors.
This recession remains disproportionately a “he-cession.” Men account for at least seven of 10 workers who lost jobs, according to the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Nearly half of the casualties are white men, who held 46 percent of all jobs lost. In 1994, liberals tried to explain their thinning ranks by casting aspersions on the white men who were fleeing, and the media took up the cry. The term “angry white male” or “angry white men” was mentioned 37 times in English-language news media contained in the Nexis database between 1980 and the 1994 election. In the following year, the phrases appear 2,306 times.
Tarnishing their opponents as merely “angry” was poor politics for the Democrats. Liberals know what it’s like to have their views — most recently on the war in Iraq or George W. Bush — caricatured as merely irrational anger. Most voters vote their interests. And many white men by the 1980s had decided the Democrats were no longer interested in them.
Think about the average working man. He has already seen financial bailouts for the rich folks above him. Now he sees a health care bailout for the poor folks below him. Big government represents lots of costs and little gain.
Meanwhile, like many women, these men are simply trying to push ahead without being pushed under. Some once believed in Obama. Now they feel forgotten.
Rosenfeld with his cigarette holder at what the captive media always fawned was a “jaunty angle”…
Government can only do so much. But recall the Depression. FDR’s focus on the economy was single-minded and relentless. Hard times continued…
[JdN: yeah, "hard times continued" all right, because unlike Adof Hitler's brilliant recovery program, Roosevelt's New Deal was a TOTAL economic failure but on purpose -- because Roosevelt and the Fed were working hand in glove to prevent a recovery, so that 1) the juze could foreclose on half the country and buy it at fire-sale prices, and 2) World War Two would be seen as the only solution to revving up the economy again, a war against Hitler Germany and Imperial Japan, both of which refused to borrow from the Rothschild banking syndicate]
….but men never doubted that FDR was trying to do right by them. Democrats should think about why they aren’t given that same benefit of the doubt today.
===============FURTHER CONFIRMATION OF THE BRADLEY-GOOCH THEORY
As I have often written, juze seem clearly to have neanderthal blood, and two, Stan Gooch and Michael Bradley, have written on this topic: Gooch, saying that these genes make juze more creative and ‘dreamy,’ Bradley saying it makes them violent psychopaths!
Here is a key post on this topic that I wrote (and linked to yesterday in discussing the late Irv Rubin
)– http://johndenugent.org/2008/11/04/anti-semitism-and-prehistoric-war
Now here is another fine article by reporter Christopher Bollyn (www.bollyn.com), and as you read it notice especially the photo of Richard Fuld…..with two classic Neanderthal traits, the bulging brow and the sloping forehead!
* * *
The Lehman Scam and Fuld’s Mossad Connection
CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN
Dylan Ratigan of MSNBC explains how the Lehman scam worked. In this 10-minute video he explains the fraud at Richard S. Fuld’s company and who was responsible. Eliot Spitzer calls for “handcuffs” and criminal prosecution of those who were in the responsible positions at the Fed, namely Timothy Geithner and Ben Shalom Bernanke. As I wrote more than a year ago, the A.I.G. and Lehman meltdowns were not accidental - they were carefully designed crimes. Richard S. Fuld and Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G. are criminals, as are the people at the Federal Reserve who allowed their criminal conduct and then bailed them out – with taxpayer funds. Will Geithner and Bernanke face criminal charges?
FULD’S MOSSAD CONNECTION
It should be noted that Richard S. Fuld is closely tied to Menachem Atzmon, the Israeli Mossadnik who owned the passenger-screening/airport security company that was behind getting the 19 Arab hijackers on the planes of 9-11. Uzi Ruskin, Menachem Atzmon, and his Mossad-funded comrades took over the failing United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. in 1993 – from Fuld’s uncle, Martin Schwab, Richard’s mother’s brother.

Richard S. Fuld
As I wrote in early October 2008 about the criminal activity of A.I.G. and Lehman, crimes which led to the trillion dollar bail-out:
Lehman Bros. CEO Dick Fuld, the much despised scion of the “Elder of Zion” Jacob Schwab, stole half a billion dollars at the company he ruined. His grandfather’s company, UM&M, was later sold to the Israeli criminal, Menachem Atzmon, culprit of 9-11 and co-criminal with Ehud Olmert. What a small world!
The CEOs behind the bail-out of A.I.G. and Lehman Bros. are both devoted Zionist fraudsters. Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G. is dealt with in the following article. Richard S. Fuld, the CEO of Lehman Bros. was paid nearly $500 million according to a recent article by Nicholas D. Kristof of the New York Times. Kristof wrote that Fuld, the longtime chief of Lehman Brothers, “took home nearly half-a-billion dollars in total compensation between 1993 and 2007.” Talk about unbridled greed.
Fuld is the grandson of Jacob W. Schwab, one of the original Zionist fund-raisers of New York. The Schwab family has a long history of criminal activity, which the New York Times has documented. These two Zionist criminals should not be bailed out; they should be arrested! This is the essence of the Zionist crimocracy I have been discussing for years. They are going for the gold in the last act and we must stop them.
Sources:
New York Times Obituary for Jacob W. Schwab, Richard S. Fuld’s maternal grandfather
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/03/30/obituaries/jacob-w-schwab-89-textile-manufacturer.html
United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. – Company History
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/United-Merchants-amp;-Manufacturers-Inc-Company-History.html
Menachem J. Atzmon, Chairman of the Board, ICTS
http://www.icts-int.com/content7429.html?id=15
“Clunker in possession”, Brigid McMenamin, Forbes, April 5, 1999
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1999/0405/6307115a_print.html
Bollyn, Christopher, “Who is Bernard Madoff – The Man Behind the $50 Billion Fraud?”, December 12, 2008
http://www.nogw.com/download2/%5E8_who_is_madoff.pdf
* * *
Please read also this second post today:







